Shockwave Therapy vs. Cold Laser

If you've been researching treatment options for chronic tendon conditions, you've no doubt heard of shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy (cold laser). They're both prevalent options for treating plantar fasciitis, rotator cuff shoulder pain, tennis elbow, Achilles tendonitis, and more. But which therapy works the best? 

When comparing shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy for treating chronic tendon conditions, it's essential to consider the strength of the evidence supporting each treatment modality. Here is an overview of the evidence for both therapies:

Evidence For Shockwave Therapy

1. Mechanism of Action: Shockwave therapy stimulates a natural healing response by delivering mechanical energy to tissues, promoting neovascularization (creating new blood flow pathways), collagen synthesis, and pain relief.
2. Studies and Meta-Analyses: Shockwave therapy has been studied extensively for chronic tendon conditions. Many high-quality RCTs and meta-analyses support its effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function.
3. Conditions Treated: Shockwave therapy has strong evidence for treating plantar fasciitis, calcific shoulder tendinopathy, lateral epicondylitis, and Achilles tendinopathy. Meta-analyses have shown significant benefits in pain relief and functional improvement for these conditions.

Limitations of SWT:

• Discomfort During Treatment: Shockwave therapy can cause temporary discomfort for some patients during the procedure.
• Cost and Availability: Shockwave therapy devices and treatments can be expensive and not readily available in all clinical settings.

Evidence for Low-Level Laser Therapy

1. Mechanism of Action: Laser therapy is believed to work by stimulating cellular activity, promoting tissue repair, reducing inflammation, and enhancing blood flow.
2. Studies and Meta-Analyses: Research on laser therapy for tendinopathies has shown mixed results. Some studies report significant pain reduction and functional improvement, while others find minimal or no benefits. Meta-analyses suggest that laser can be effective, but the optimal parameters (wavelength, dosage, duration) need to be better-defined.
3. Conditions Treated: Laser therapy has shown promise for conditions like Achilles tendinopathy, lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow), and rotator cuff tendinopathy. However, the evidence varies, and further research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols.

Limitations of Laser Therapy:

• Inconsistent Results: Variability in study outcomes makes it difficult to determine if laser therapy is truly effective.
• Need for More High-Quality Studies: While some studies are positive, more rigorous, large-scale, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm efficacy.

Shockwave Therapy vs. Low-Level Laser Therapy

1. Shockwave Therapy: Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses conclude that shockwave therapy is effective for chronic tendon conditions, with strong evidence supporting its use for plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinopathy, and lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow). Shockwave therapy is often recommended as a treatment option for patients who do not respond to other conservative therapies.
2. Low-Level Laser Therapy: The evidence for laser therapy is promising but less consistent. While some studies report benefits, the overall quality and consistency of evidence are lower compared to shockwave therapy. Laser therapy may be beneficial, but more research is needed to establish its efficacy conclusively.

Based on current evidence, shockwave therapy generally has more robust and consistent support for treating chronic tendon conditions compared to low-level laser therapy. Shockwave therapy is backed by numerous high-quality studies and meta-analyses demonstrating its effectiveness in pain relief and functional improvement for various tendinopathies. While laser therapy shows promise and has some supportive evidence, it is not as robust or consistent as the evidence for SWT.

‍